litellm - 💡(How to fix) Fix Misleading UI when internal user page visibility settings not set [1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
BerriAI/litellm#25366Fetched 2026-04-09 07:52:29
View on GitHub
Comments
0
Participants
1
Timeline
0
Reactions
0
Participants
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

As seen in the attached screenshot, when the internal user page visibility settings are not set, all pages default to visible. However, by default, none of the checkboxes are checked, implying that none of these pages are visible. The instructions later say "Select specific pages to restrict visibility." Does that mean that selected pages are made invisible? That seems unlikely and is counter to what is implied by the rest of the page.

Methods to improve UX:

  1. Default all checkboxes to be true/checked in the UI while the settings are not set and the default is true/visible. If unset, perhaps the checkboxes should be greyed out until they are changed and/or these are set?
  2. Another option: These settings can be set to true from the beginning, avoiding any confusion arising from set vs unset and unset defaults disagreeing with visual representations. This option keeps things functioning the exact same way and reduces some complexity.

Personally, I prefer option 2. I think it simplifies the settings dataflow, even if it might require a touch more effort.

<img width="2038" height="1408" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/91740b32-7dd7-4ebd-abde-63eb0d65ed27" />

extent analysis

TL;DR

Set the internal user page visibility settings to true by default to avoid confusion and ensure consistent behavior.

Guidance

  • Review the current implementation of the page visibility settings to understand how the default values are handled when the settings are not explicitly set.
  • Consider implementing option 2, which involves setting the visibility settings to true from the beginning, to simplify the settings dataflow and reduce complexity.
  • Evaluate the potential impact of changing the default behavior on existing users and consider implementing a gradual rollout or providing clear documentation to avoid confusion.
  • Assess the trade-offs between the two proposed options, including the potential effort required to implement each solution and the resulting user experience.

Example

No code snippet is provided as the issue does not contain specific code references.

Notes

The solution may vary depending on the specific requirements and constraints of the project, and it is essential to consider the potential impact on existing users and the overall user experience.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Set the internal user page visibility settings to true by default, as it simplifies the settings dataflow and reduces complexity, making it easier for users to understand and manage page visibility.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING