claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [MODEL] Claude ignored instructions/configuration (also: Claude made incorrect assumptions)

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…

Root Cause

  1. Claimed a git commit had landed when git log showed it had not (commit silently didn't complete).
  2. Investigated a UI bug, then asserted the user's screenshot was a "stale/older build" — false; it was the current local build. Stated the issue was non-existent without a confirmed root cause.
  3. Described a "Round 1 CSS commit" as done in a planning doc when no such commit existed on the branch.
  4. Issued tool calls (workflow dispatch + a background watcher) in the same turn as an AskUserQuestion, then continued after the question was rejected.
  5. Repeatedly fired large parallel tool-call batches; when one call failed, the harness cancelled 10+ sibling calls, producing cascades of "Cancelled: parallel tool call" errors.
  6. Drafted a bug report that didn't match the repo's actual issue-template format (no template awareness).

Fix Action

Fix / Workaround

  1. Claimed a git commit had landed when git log showed it had not (commit silently didn't complete).
  2. Investigated a UI bug, then asserted the user's screenshot was a "stale/older build" — false; it was the current local build. Stated the issue was non-existent without a confirmed root cause.
  3. Described a "Round 1 CSS commit" as done in a planning doc when no such commit existed on the branch.
  4. Issued tool calls (workflow dispatch + a background watcher) in the same turn as an AskUserQuestion, then continued after the question was rejected.
  5. Repeatedly fired large parallel tool-call batches; when one call failed, the harness cancelled 10+ sibling calls, producing cascades of "Cancelled: parallel tool call" errors.
  6. Drafted a bug report that didn't match the repo's actual issue-template format (no template awareness).

Code Example



---

Verbatim transcript on disk:
`~/.claude/projects/-Users-brandonfield-risk-sentinel-sparc/2cf1ba83-e543-450a-8c6c-882c0506b82b.jsonl`
Session ID: `2cf1ba83-e543-450a-8c6c-882c0506b82b`
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Preflight Checklist

  • I have searched existing issues for similar behavior reports
  • This report does NOT contain sensitive information (API keys, passwords, etc.)

Type of Behavior Issue

Claude ignored my instructions or configuration

What You Asked Claude to Do

Multi-hour engineering session (a11y/CSS refactor, git/gh/docker/pytest work). Standing instructions included: verify before claiming done; one action at a time / don't fire huge parallel batches; don't act while a question is pending; don't proceed after a rejection.

What Claude Actually Did

  1. Claimed a git commit had landed when git log showed it had not (commit silently didn't complete).
  2. Investigated a UI bug, then asserted the user's screenshot was a "stale/older build" — false; it was the current local build. Stated the issue was non-existent without a confirmed root cause.
  3. Described a "Round 1 CSS commit" as done in a planning doc when no such commit existed on the branch.
  4. Issued tool calls (workflow dispatch + a background watcher) in the same turn as an AskUserQuestion, then continued after the question was rejected.
  5. Repeatedly fired large parallel tool-call batches; when one call failed, the harness cancelled 10+ sibling calls, producing cascades of "Cancelled: parallel tool call" errors.
  6. Drafted a bug report that didn't match the repo's actual issue-template format (no template awareness).

Expected Behavior

Verify state (git log / browser / test output) before claiming completion; never contradict user-provided evidence without confirming; honor "stop"/pending-question state; keep tool batches small enough that one failure doesn't cancel unrelated work.

Files Affected

Permission Mode

Accept Edits was ON (auto-accepting changes)

Can You Reproduce This?

Sometimes (intermittent)

Steps to Reproduce

Sometimes (intermittent) — correlated with long sessions, high tool-call volume, heavy background tasks, large parallel batches.

Long session, many tool calls, frequent run_in_background, multi-call batches. Not deterministic.

Claude Model

Opus

Relevant Conversation

Verbatim transcript on disk:
`~/.claude/projects/-Users-brandonfield-risk-sentinel-sparc/2cf1ba83-e543-450a-8c6c-882c0506b82b.jsonl`
Session ID: `2cf1ba83-e543-450a-8c6c-882c0506b82b`

Impact

High - Significant unwanted changes

Claude Code Version

2.0.76

Platform

Anthropic API

Additional Context

Separately, the in-session /feedback command failed to submit, which is why this is being filed manually. Harness-level issues observed in the same session (may warrant a separate bug_report.yml): background tasks completing with no usable result; parallel-batch cancellation cascades; deferred tool schemas (TaskStop/TaskCreate) not loaded before invocation.

This session burned nearly all my tokens in less than an hour with VERY few asked commands which is further burdensome because the tokens produced no outputs, had incorrect outputs and/or multi-tool calls that got stuck.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [MODEL] Claude ignored instructions/configuration (also: Claude made incorrect assumptions)