openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix Optimize MasterTour itinerary day writes for multiple days [1 comments, 1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
openclaw/openclaw#72746Fetched 2026-04-28 06:32:34
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
1
Timeline
2
Reactions
0
Participants
Timeline (top)
closed ×1commented ×1

Root Cause

When updating the schedule across multiple days (e.g., adding/updating band calls for 3 consecutive days), the current mastertour.itinerary script requires many individual tool calls (list, create, update, delete per item/day) because it processes one item on one day at a time.

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

When updating the schedule across multiple days (e.g., adding/updating band calls for 3 consecutive days), the current mastertour.itinerary script requires many individual tool calls (list, create, update, delete per item/day) because it processes one item on one day at a time.

This takes too long in chat.

Suggested Fix: The mastertour.py SDK already has write_schedule(day_id, proposed_items, delete_removed=True) which handles syncId/diffing automatically. We should add a new bulk tool (e.g., mastertour.day_schedule_sync) or extend mastertour.itinerary to accept a list of items and use write_schedule under the hood. Even better if we can pass a batch of day_ids so it resolves everything in one script execution.

extent analysis

TL;DR

Implement a bulk update tool or extend the existing mastertour.itinerary script to utilize the write_schedule function from the mastertour.py SDK for efficient schedule updates across multiple days.

Guidance

  • Identify the current performance bottleneck in the mastertour.itinerary script, which processes one item per day sequentially.
  • Explore the write_schedule function in mastertour.py to understand its capabilities in handling schedule updates and deletions.
  • Design a new bulk tool, mastertour.day_schedule_sync, or extend mastertour.itinerary to accept a list of items and day IDs, leveraging write_schedule for efficient updates.
  • Consider the benefits of passing a batch of day IDs to resolve schedule updates in a single script execution for improved performance.

Example

# Example usage of write_schedule function
day_id = "example_day_id"
proposed_items = [{"item1": "details"}, {"item2": "details"}]
mastertour.write_schedule(day_id, proposed_items, delete_removed=True)

Notes

The implementation details of the write_schedule function and its integration with the proposed bulk tool or extended mastertour.itinerary script are crucial for a seamless update process.

Recommendation

Apply workaround by extending the mastertour.itinerary script to utilize the write_schedule function for bulk schedule updates, as this approach seems to offer a more efficient solution without requiring significant changes to the existing infrastructure.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING