llamaIndex - ✅(Solved) Fix [Question]: Why PR closed automatically? [1 pull requests, 6 comments, 3 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
run-llama/llama_index#21245Fetched 2026-04-08 02:22:32
View on GitHub
Comments
6
Participants
3
Timeline
18
Reactions
0
Author
Timeline (top)
commented ×6mentioned ×5subscribed ×5closed ×1

PR fix notes

PR #21235: Add Redis semantic cache

Description (problem / solution / changelog)

Description

Add Redis Semantic Cache to improve RAG applications. RedisVL provides a SemanticCache interface to utilize Redis' built-in caching capabilities AND vector search in order to store responses from previously-answered questions. This reduces the number of requests and tokens sent to the Large Language Models (LLM) service, decreasing costs and enhancing application throughput (by reducing the time taken to generate responses).

Fixes # (issue)

New Package?

Did I fill in the tool.llamahub section in the pyproject.toml and provide a detailed README.md for my new integration or package?

  • Yes
  • No

Version Bump?

Did I bump the version in the pyproject.toml file of the package I am updating? (Except for the llama-index-core package)

  • Yes
  • No

Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Your pull-request will likely not be merged unless it is covered by some form of impactful unit testing.

  • I added new unit tests to cover this change
  • I believe this change is already covered by existing unit tests

Suggested Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added Google Colab support for the newly added notebooks.
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I ran uv run make format; uv run make lint to appease the lint gods

Changed files

  • llama-index-integrations/ingestion/llama-index-ingestion-redis-semantic-cache/README.md (added, +91/-0)
  • llama-index-integrations/ingestion/llama-index-ingestion-redis-semantic-cache/llama_index/ingestion/redis_semantic_cache/__init__.py (added, +8/-0)
  • llama-index-integrations/ingestion/llama-index-ingestion-redis-semantic-cache/llama_index/ingestion/redis_semantic_cache/base.py (added, +443/-0)
  • llama-index-integrations/ingestion/llama-index-ingestion-redis-semantic-cache/llama_index/ingestion/redis_semantic_cache/vectorizer.py (added, +170/-0)
  • llama-index-integrations/ingestion/llama-index-ingestion-redis-semantic-cache/pyproject.toml (added, +65/-0)
  • llama-index-integrations/ingestion/llama-index-ingestion-redis-semantic-cache/tests/conftest.py (added, +50/-0)
  • llama-index-integrations/ingestion/llama-index-ingestion-redis-semantic-cache/tests/test_redis_semantic_cache.py (added, +378/-0)
  • llama-index-integrations/ingestion/llama-index-ingestion-redis-semantic-cache/uv.lock (added, +3660/-0)
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Question Validation

  • I have searched both the documentation and discord for an answer.

Question

I do not understand why my PR #21235 was closed automatically? This is the message I received by the GitHub action.

I do not get why I cannot push a pyproject.toml file in my integration since all have one and it does need that.

If there is another way to contribute to the repository, please let me know. I thought to have followed well the contributing instructions.

extent analysis

TL;DR

The PR was likely closed automatically due to a GitHub Action policy restricting changes to the pyproject.toml file.

Guidance

  • Review the GitHub Action message and the repository's contributing instructions to understand the specific policy or restriction in place.
  • Check if there are any alternative ways to achieve the desired integration without modifying the pyproject.toml file.
  • Consider reaching out to the repository maintainers for clarification on the policy and potential workarounds.
  • Verify that the pyproject.toml file is necessary for the integration and explore other configuration options.

Notes

The exact reason for the automatic closure is not specified in the issue, but it is implied to be related to the pyproject.toml file. The user has followed the contributing instructions, suggesting that the issue may be related to a specific repository policy.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: The user should try to find an alternative way to contribute to the repository without modifying the pyproject.toml file, and reach out to the maintainers for clarification if needed.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING