openclaw - ✅(Solved) Fix Reasoning stream warning incorrectly says 'Telegram only' but works in Lark/Feishu [1 pull requests, 1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
openclaw/openclaw#68305Fetched 2026-04-18 05:53:12
View on GitHub
Comments
0
Participants
1
Timeline
2
Reactions
0
Participants
Timeline (top)
cross-referenced ×1referenced ×1

Fix Action

Fixed

PR fix notes

PR #68311: fix: update reasoning stream message to include Feishu support

Description (problem / solution / changelog)

Summary

Updates the confirmation message shown when enabling reasoning stream mode to correctly indicate that the feature works in both Telegram and Feishu (Lark) channels.

Root Cause

The reasoning stream feature was implemented for both Telegram and Feishu channels (as evidenced by ), but the confirmation message shown to users incorrectly stated 'Telegram only'.

Fix

Changed the message from:

  • 'Reasoning stream enabled (Telegram only).'

To:

  • 'Reasoning stream enabled (Telegram/Feishu).'

Test Plan

  • Verified Feishu extension has reasoning stream support ( function)
  • Existing directive parsing tests pass
  • No functional changes, only UI text update

Closes openclaw#68305

Changed files

  • src/auto-reply/reply/directive-handling.impl.ts (modified, +1/-1)
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

When using the /reasoning command in Lark (Feishu), the bot returns a warning message:

⚙️ Reasoning stream enabled (Telegram only).

However, the reasoning stream actually works fine in Lark/Feishu as well. The warning message is misleading and suggests the feature is not supported in Lark, but it is functional.

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Connect OpenClaw to Lark/Feishu channel
  2. Send /reasoning command in a Lark chat
  3. Observe the warning: 'Reasoning stream enabled (Telegram only)'
  4. The reasoning stream still works despite the warning

Expected behavior: The warning message should either be removed or updated to indicate that reasoning stream is supported in Lark/Feishu, or the message should only be shown for channels where reasoning stream is truly not supported.

Environment:

  • OpenClaw version: 2026.4.15
  • Channel: Lark/Feishu

extent analysis

TL;DR

Update the warning message to reflect that the reasoning stream is supported in Lark/Feishu or remove it altogether to avoid confusion.

Guidance

  • Verify the OpenClaw version to ensure it's the latest, as the issue might be resolved in a newer version.
  • Check the channel configuration to confirm that the reasoning stream is properly enabled for Lark/Feishu.
  • Consider modifying the warning message to include Lark/Feishu as a supported channel or to make it channel-agnostic.
  • Test the reasoning stream feature in different channels to confirm its functionality and the warning message's behavior.

Example

No code snippet is provided as the issue does not imply a specific code change.

Notes

The solution assumes that the warning message is the primary issue and that the reasoning stream's functionality is not affected. However, the root cause of the misleading warning message is unclear and might require further investigation.

Recommendation

Apply a workaround by modifying the warning message to accurately reflect the supported channels, as updating to a potentially non-existent fixed version is not implied in the issue. This approach allows for an immediate fix to the misleading warning without waiting for a version update.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING