openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix Reduce duplicate SecretRef provider lookups during gateway startup [1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
openclaw/openclaw#70952Fetched 2026-04-24 10:37:27
View on GitHub
Comments
0
Participants
1
Timeline
0
Reactions
0
Author
Participants

Code Example

26x /v1/vaults?filter=title+eq+%22TARS+Write%22

---

SecretRefs resolved: 84 provider calls, 28 unique provider paths, 56 cache hits
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

OpenClaw gateway startup appears to perform repeated SecretRef provider lookups for the same vaults/items during config/runtime secret resolution.

This was noticed while using 1Password Connect/service account token-backed SecretRefs. We hit 1Password’s 1,000 queries/day service account token limit, and then later also tripped a local Traefik rate limit in front of OPC during gateway startup.

Concrete startup observation with 1Password Connect:

  • Startup time: 2026-04-24 00:46:33 EDT
  • OPC calls in first 60s: 84
  • Unique paths: 28
  • Duplicate calls: 56
  • Statuses: all 200

Breakdown:

  • Vault/container name lookups: 28
    • only 2 unique vaults
  • Item/secret name lookups: 28
    • 13 unique items
  • Item/secret fetch by ID: 28
    • 13 unique items

Top duplicate:

26x /v1/vaults?filter=title+eq+%22TARS+Write%22

This is probably not 1Password-specific. 1Password is just the backend where the duplicate provider calls became visible and painful.

Suggested fix:

Add in-memory memoization during one SecretRef/config resolution pass:

  • cache provider-level container lookup, e.g. provider + vault/container name -> id
  • cache provider-level item lookup, e.g. provider + container id + item/secret name -> id
  • cache fetched secret/item payloads
  • optionally cache full SecretRef string resolution

Constraints:

  • no disk cache
  • no plaintext secret logging
  • cache lifetime should be process/startup-resolution scoped
  • behavior/output unchanged except fewer provider calls

Useful diagnostic log, values redacted:

SecretRefs resolved: 84 provider calls, 28 unique provider paths, 56 cache hits

Impact:

  • reduces startup secret-provider traffic
  • avoids burning through provider API quotas
  • avoids requiring high external rate limits
  • improves reliability for 1Password Connect and future SecretRef backends
  • keeps secrets in memory only, matching current security posture

extent analysis

TL;DR

Implement in-memory memoization for SecretRef provider lookups to reduce repeated queries during gateway startup.

Guidance

  • Identify the SecretRef resolution pass where memoization can be applied to cache provider-level container and item lookups.
  • Implement a cache with a process/startup-resolution scoped lifetime to store fetched secret/item payloads and reduce provider calls.
  • Verify the effectiveness of memoization by monitoring diagnostic logs, such as the number of provider calls and cache hits.
  • Consider caching full SecretRef string resolution for additional optimization.

Example

No code snippet is provided as the issue does not contain sufficient implementation details.

Notes

The suggested fix is likely to be effective for reducing startup secret-provider traffic and avoiding API quotas, but its implementation may vary depending on the specific SecretRef backend and gateway architecture.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Implement in-memory memoization for SecretRef provider lookups, as it is a targeted solution to reduce repeated queries and improve reliability without requiring external changes.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix Reduce duplicate SecretRef provider lookups during gateway startup [1 participants]