openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix Reply-path failure can emit internal-looking reasoning text instead of a clean assistant reply [1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
openclaw/openclaw#63253Fetched 2026-04-09 07:56:14
View on GitHub
Comments
0
Participants
1
Timeline
0
Reactions
0

OpenClaw produced user-visible replies that contained internal-looking reasoning/staging text instead of a clean final assistant reply. This included visible Reasoning: text, NO_REPLY deliberation, and stale draft/outdated assessment leakage.

Error Message

  • Matrix replies contained internal-looking reasoning text.
  • Some leaked text referenced whether to respond, whether a skill applied, and whether NO_REPLY should be emitted.
  • Later artifacts in group-chat context looked like stale draft/outdated assessment leakage rather than a clean current reply.
  • The symptom overlapped with the same incident window as replay/dedup and Matrix reply-path instability.

Root Cause

OpenClaw produced user-visible replies that contained internal-looking reasoning/staging text instead of a clean final assistant reply. This included visible Reasoning: text, NO_REPLY deliberation, and stale draft/outdated assessment leakage.

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Reply-path failure can emit internal-looking reasoning text instead of a clean assistant reply

Summary

OpenClaw produced user-visible replies that contained internal-looking reasoning/staging text instead of a clean final assistant reply. This included visible Reasoning: text, NO_REPLY deliberation, and stale draft/outdated assessment leakage.

Expected behavior

Users should receive only the intended final assistant reply. Internal reasoning, control text, scratchpad content, and stale draft buffers must never be surfaced.

Observed behavior

  • Matrix replies contained internal-looking reasoning text.
  • Some leaked text referenced whether to respond, whether a skill applied, and whether NO_REPLY should be emitted.
  • Later artifacts in group-chat context looked like stale draft/outdated assessment leakage rather than a clean current reply.
  • The symptom overlapped with the same incident window as replay/dedup and Matrix reply-path instability.

Impact

  • direct user-visible trust/safety failure
  • stale draft content can be mistaken for live operational truth
  • reply assembly / filtering / resend behavior appears corrupted under failure conditions

Environment

  • Haywood (macOS, Apple Silicon)
  • OpenClaw 2026.4.2 line observed locally
  • first observed in Matrix DM context, later also in group-chat context

Evidence

  1. multiple visible replies contained Reasoning: / internal-looking deliberation text
  2. leaked text referenced NO_REPLY and internal state-update decisions
  3. later stale/outdated assessment leakage appeared in group-chat context as well
  4. operators treated these as malformed reply artifacts, not valid instructions

Reproduction sketch

Not yet reduced to a minimal repro. Current suspected shape:

  1. encounter a reply-path failure / resend path in Matrix
  2. allow recovery or retry behavior to occur
  3. inspect whether the user-visible reply is assembled from the wrong internal buffer/stage

Notes / hypotheses

  • retry path may be sending an intermediate/internal buffer instead of the final answer
  • resend/recovery logic may be mixing internal reasoning metadata with user-visible output
  • stale draft buffers may be emitted on replay/resend

extent analysis

TL;DR

Inspect and adjust the reply assembly and filtering logic in the OpenClaw 2026.4.2 line to prevent internal-looking reasoning text and stale draft content from being surfaced to users.

Guidance

  • Review the retry path and resend/recovery logic in the Matrix reply-path to ensure that the final answer buffer is being sent instead of intermediate/internal buffers.
  • Verify that the internal reasoning metadata is being properly separated from user-visible output to prevent leakage of Reasoning: text and NO_REPLY deliberation.
  • Investigate the possibility of stale draft buffers being emitted on replay/resend and implement measures to prevent this, such as clearing or updating the draft buffers before sending the final reply.
  • Consider adding additional logging or debugging statements to help identify the root cause of the issue and verify the effectiveness of any fixes.

Example

No specific code snippet can be provided without more information about the implementation details of the OpenClaw system. However, the fix may involve modifying the reply assembly and filtering logic to include additional checks or buffers to prevent internal-looking reasoning text and stale draft content from being surfaced.

Notes

The exact fix may depend on the specific implementation details of the OpenClaw system, which are not provided in the issue description. Additional debugging and logging may be necessary to fully understand the root cause of the issue and develop an effective fix.

Recommendation

Apply a workaround to the reply assembly and filtering logic to prevent internal-looking reasoning text and stale draft content from being surfaced to users, as the root cause of the issue is not yet fully understood and a complete fix may require additional investigation and testing.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

FAQ

Expected behavior

Users should receive only the intended final assistant reply. Internal reasoning, control text, scratchpad content, and stale draft buffers must never be surfaced.

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING