codex - 💡(How to fix) Fix Security Heuristics Regression: Excessive False Positives in version 5.5 xhigh

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

What version of the Codex App are you using (From “About Codex” dialog)?

26.513.31313 (2867)

What subscription do you have?

ChatGPT Pro 200USD/m

What platform is your computer?

MacOS

What issue are you seeing?

Version 5.5 incorrectly flags my work as network cracking. In reality, my operations are strictly local, primarily involving indexing and filtering a local database to match software metadata. These actions do not involve any network-based attacks or malicious exploits.

For my current project, I am developing software designed to identify which applications in a given directory are macOS apps. Once identified, it sorts out the Mac apps and deletes the non-Mac apps. Consequently, it needs to read various metadata within the applications, all of which are purely local behaviors. In the future, this program will be used to identify which GitHub repositories provide release links that download as Mac apps. All of this falls completely within the scope of normal usage. There is absolutely no behavior aimed at bypassing security mechanisms.

The current frequency of these alerts is intolerable and interferes with my daily workflow. I request that you investigate the changes made in the 5.5 update, address this over-sensitivity issue, and provide a method to suppress these false positives for my local development activities.

What steps can reproduce the bug?

Feedback ID: 019e20fb-2585-70c2-9205-8e76876ade32

What is the expected behavior?

No response

Additional information

No response

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

codex - 💡(How to fix) Fix Security Heuristics Regression: Excessive False Positives in version 5.5 xhigh