openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix Security: SSRF in fal image generation provider (fetchImageBuffer) [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
openclaw/openclaw#54292Fetched 2026-04-08 01:29:31
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
4
Reactions
0
Timeline (top)
closed ×1commented ×1labeled ×1locked ×1

fetchImageBuffer(url) in the fal image generation provider performs a bare fetch(url) with no SSRF protection, no hostname allowlist, and no private network check.

async function fetchImageBuffer(url) {
    const response = await fetch(url);  // no SSRF guard
    ...
}

The URL originates from the fal API response (payload.images[].url). Other similar fetchers in the codebase correctly use fetchWithSsrFGuard or fetchWithGuard with allowPrivateNetwork: false.

Root Cause

fetchImageBuffer(url) in the fal image generation provider performs a bare fetch(url) with no SSRF protection, no hostname allowlist, and no private network check.

async function fetchImageBuffer(url) {
    const response = await fetch(url);  // no SSRF guard
    ...
}

The URL originates from the fal API response (payload.images[].url). Other similar fetchers in the codebase correctly use fetchWithSsrFGuard or fetchWithGuard with allowPrivateNetwork: false.

Code Example

async function fetchImageBuffer(url) {
    const response = await fetch(url);  // no SSRF guard
    ...
}
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Summary

fetchImageBuffer(url) in the fal image generation provider performs a bare fetch(url) with no SSRF protection, no hostname allowlist, and no private network check.

async function fetchImageBuffer(url) {
    const response = await fetch(url);  // no SSRF guard
    ...
}

The URL originates from the fal API response (payload.images[].url). Other similar fetchers in the codebase correctly use fetchWithSsrFGuard or fetchWithGuard with allowPrivateNetwork: false.

Impact

If a compromised or malicious fal endpoint returns an internal/private URL (e.g., http://169.254.169.254/... for cloud metadata, or http://localhost:18789/... for the gateway), the server will fetch it, potentially leaking internal data.

Location

dist/image-generation-provider-DBhbTVWi.js:94

Suggested Fix

Replace fetch(url) with fetchWithSsrFGuard(url, { allowPrivateNetwork: false }) consistent with other image fetchers in the codebase.

Audit Method

Pattern A (consistency comparison) — other image fetchers use SSRF guards, this one does not.

extent analysis

Fix Plan

To address the Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability, replace the fetch(url) call with a guarded fetch that includes a check for private networks.

  • Replace the existing fetchImageBuffer function with the following code:
async function fetchImageBuffer(url) {
    const response = await fetchWithSsrFGuard(url, { allowPrivateNetwork: false });
    ...
}
  • Ensure fetchWithSsrFGuard is properly implemented to block requests to private networks and internal hosts.

Verification

To verify the fix, test the fetchImageBuffer function with URLs that should be blocked, such as:

  • http://169.254.169.254/
  • http://localhost:18789/

The function should throw an error or return an error response when attempting to fetch these URLs.

Extra Tips

  • Review the codebase for other instances of unguarded fetch calls and apply similar fixes.
  • Consider adding additional logging or monitoring to detect potential SSRF attempts.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING