claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix Separate effort levels for plan mode vs. execution mode

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…

Error Message

The /effort level is a single global value that persists unchanged across plan/execute transitions. Many workflows want maximum reasoning while planning (architecture, trade-offs) but faster, cheaper execution once the plan is approved. Today this requires manually running /effort max before planning and /effort high after — error-prone and easy to forget. There is no hook event for entering/exiting plan mode, so it cannot be automated either.

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Problem

The /effort level is a single global value that persists unchanged across plan/execute transitions. Many workflows want maximum reasoning while planning (architecture, trade-offs) but faster, cheaper execution once the plan is approved. Today this requires manually running /effort max before planning and /effort high after — error-prone and easy to forget. There is no hook event for entering/exiting plan mode, so it cannot be automated either.

Existing partial solution

The opusplan model alias varies the model by mode (Opus for plan, Sonnet for execute) but does not control effort independently, and forces a model change you may not want.

Requested feature

A way to set two effort levels that the harness applies automatically based on mode. For example:

  • New settings keys: planEffortLevel and executeEffortLevel in settings.json
  • Or a /plan-effort <level> command, with /effort continuing to govern non-plan turns
  • Falling back to the single effortLevel when the mode-specific key is unset (fully backward compatible)

Why

Plan mode is already a distinct, harness-tracked mode with its own permission semantics; effort is the one reasoning dial that is not mode-aware. Making it mode-aware aligns cost with where deep reasoning actually pays off.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix Separate effort levels for plan mode vs. execution mode