claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix Severe latency regression on Opus 4.7 — ~20 min for simple prompts (was ~1 min 2 months ago) [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#60647Fetched 2026-05-20 03:53:05
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
5
Reactions
3
Timeline (top)
labeled ×4commented ×1

Claude Code has become dramatically slower over the past ~2 months. Prompts that previously completed in ~1 minute now take ~20 minutes of thinking/response time, even for trivial edits on small files. This is blocking my daily use.

Root Cause

Claude Code has become dramatically slower over the past ~2 months. Prompts that previously completed in ~1 minute now take ~20 minutes of thinking/response time, even for trivial edits on small files. This is blocking my daily use.

Fix Action

Fix / Workaround

/fast mode made it worse, not better

I tried /fast mode to work around the slowness, and on the same small prompt against the same small files it burned through roughly $20 or more of Max-plan usage for a single task. So the "workaround" trades latency for cost without actually delivering speed — net regression in both dimensions.

Asks

  • Is this a known regression on Opus 4.7?
  • Is there a server-side issue with routing/thinking budget for Max users on Opus 4.7?
  • What's the recommended workaround? Should Max users default to Sonnet 4.6 or Haiku 4.5 for these tasks now?
  • Happy to attach session telemetry / a transcript if you point me at where to send it.
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Summary

Claude Code has become dramatically slower over the past ~2 months. Prompts that previously completed in ~1 minute now take ~20 minutes of thinking/response time, even for trivial edits on small files. This is blocking my daily use.

Environment

  • Claude Code CLI on macOS (Darwin 25.2.0, zsh)
  • Model: Opus 4.7 (claude-opus-4-7)
  • Plan: Claude Max

Timeline

  • ~2 months ago (around March 2026): reasonable latency, ~1 minute per simple turn.
  • Progressively worse since.
  • Today: ~20 minutes wall-clock for a single simple-edit turn on small files. Roughly a 20× regression for equivalent work.

Repro

  1. Open a small project (few files, short files).
  2. Ask for a trivial change — e.g. "rename this function", "add a prop", "fix this typo".
  3. Observe the thinking/response time before any tool call lands.

Expected: sub-minute response on trivial edits, matching behavior from ~2 months ago. Actual: ~20 minutes per turn.

/fast mode made it worse, not better

I tried /fast mode to work around the slowness, and on the same small prompt against the same small files it burned through roughly $20 or more of Max-plan usage for a single task. So the "workaround" trades latency for cost without actually delivering speed — net regression in both dimensions.

Asks

  • Is this a known regression on Opus 4.7?
  • Is there a server-side issue with routing/thinking budget for Max users on Opus 4.7?
  • What's the recommended workaround? Should Max users default to Sonnet 4.6 or Haiku 4.5 for these tasks now?
  • Happy to attach session telemetry / a transcript if you point me at where to send it.

Impact

20× slower + /fast burning through plan credits = Claude Code is currently not usable for the iterative small-edit workflow it used to be great at.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING