claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix Silent failure: large input received, zero output produced, no error surfaced [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#57755Fetched 2026-05-11 03:26:17
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
3
Reactions
0
Author
Timeline (top)
labeled ×2commented ×1

Error Message

  • Tool chain call error that failed silently before response was generated
  • API timeout on large input with no error surfaced to user This is not an isolated incident. Multiple prior sessions have shown silent failures when input is large (contracts, architecture dumps, multi-part technical context). The failure is always silent — no error message, no partial response, no spinner timeout, no indication anything went wrong. Surface a visible error or partial acknowledgement when response generation fails after input is received. Silent failure with zero output is worse than an error message — the user cannot distinguish between "Claude is thinking" and "Claude has failed." A simple "I received your message but encountered an error generating a response — please re-send or try a shorter message" would resolve this entirely.
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

What Happened

During an active development session (ZeroCopy Möbius V6 DEX, 2026-05-09), a large user message was sent containing:

  • ~230 lines of Solidity contract code (v6_tmi_ring.sol)
  • ~60 lines of architecture explanation (WASM / JS / Ethereum finality separation)
  • A direct question asking for feedback on the architecture

Claude received the input — the message appeared in the conversation — but produced zero output. No response text, no tool calls, nothing. Complete silence.

The user had to re-prompt to get any response. Even then, the first response misread the failure and began documenting architecture content instead of acknowledging the failure itself. A second re-prompt was required to clarify what had actually gone wrong.

Failure Classification

Type: Response generation failure — input processed, output not produced

Probable cause (one or more of):

  • Tool chain call error that failed silently before response was generated
  • Response stream interrupted or dropped before delivery to user
  • Context window pressure from large input causing generation to abort silently
  • API timeout on large input with no error surfaced to user

Not: A content refusal, permission issue, or misunderstanding. The input was entirely legitimate technical content.

Impact

  • User lost time waiting for output that never came
  • Required two re-prompts just to establish what had failed
  • Workflow interrupted mid-session during active development work

Input Size

  • ~230 lines Solidity
  • ~60 lines architecture text
  • One question

Large but not unprecedented. No unusual characters, no ambiguous instructions.

Pattern

This is not an isolated incident. Multiple prior sessions have shown silent failures when input is large (contracts, architecture dumps, multi-part technical context). The failure is always silent — no error message, no partial response, no spinner timeout, no indication anything went wrong.

Expected Behavior / Recommendation

Surface a visible error or partial acknowledgement when response generation fails after input is received.

Silent failure with zero output is worse than an error message — the user cannot distinguish between "Claude is thinking" and "Claude has failed." A simple "I received your message but encountered an error generating a response — please re-send or try a shorter message" would resolve this entirely.


Reported via Claude Code session. Local report: CLAUDE_INPUT_RECEIVED_NO_OUTPUT_FAILURE_20260509.md

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix Silent failure: large input received, zero output produced, no error surfaced [1 comments, 2 participants]