claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix Sudden 5-hour session window squeeze starting Apr 29, 2026 evening [19 comments, 12 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#55053Fetched 2026-05-01 05:47:28
View on GitHub
Comments
19
Participants
12
Timeline
28
Reactions
8

Since the evening of April 29, 2026, the 5-hour session window depletes 5–10× faster than before for the same kind of work. A typical light editing session (a few scp, Read, small patches via Edit) burns ~20–25% of the session window in well under an hour. Sonnet sub-agents launched via Agent repeatedly hit "You've hit your limit" within 15–30 minutes of work — they used to run for hours.

The frustrating part is that the weekly quota is barely touchedW shows ~59% remaining with 23+ hours of headroom — yet the session-window cap blocks me from using that headroom. I have plenty of weekly budget, but the 5-hour window won't let me spend it.

Root Cause

Right now Claude Code, for which I subscribe primarily on Max tier, is significantly less usable than it was a week ago — not because of model quality (which is good), but because the cadence of forced waits has gone from "rare and predictable" to "every hour or so, no matter how lightly I work."

Fix Action

Fix / Workaround

Since the evening of April 29, 2026, the 5-hour session window depletes 5–10× faster than before for the same kind of work. A typical light editing session (a few scp, Read, small patches via Edit) burns ~20–25% of the session window in well under an hour. Sonnet sub-agents launched via Agent repeatedly hit "You've hit your limit" within 15–30 minutes of work — they used to run for hours.

Mitigations I've applied so far:

  • Lowered effortLevel from high to medium in ~/.claude/settings.json (~1.5× longer windows but at quality cost).
  • Stopped launching Sonnet sub-agents in parallel (they cannibalize each other's quota).
  • Splitting big tasks into ~30-minute Sonnet chunks instead of 90.

These help, but they're workarounds, not solutions.

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Summary

Since the evening of April 29, 2026, the 5-hour session window depletes 5–10× faster than before for the same kind of work. A typical light editing session (a few scp, Read, small patches via Edit) burns ~20–25% of the session window in well under an hour. Sonnet sub-agents launched via Agent repeatedly hit "You've hit your limit" within 15–30 minutes of work — they used to run for hours.

The frustrating part is that the weekly quota is barely touchedW shows ~59% remaining with 23+ hours of headroom — yet the session-window cap blocks me from using that headroom. I have plenty of weekly budget, but the 5-hour window won't let me spend it.

Context

I'm aware of the April 23, 2026 post-mortem about restoring high reasoning effort and reverting the verbosity prompt. Those changes do explain some token-cost increase per turn. They do not explain the disproportionate ratio between session-window depletion and weekly-quota consumption that started on April 29 specifically — i.e. several days after the April 23 fix.

Reproduction signals

  • S (5-hour session window) hits 20%+ within 30–60 minutes of light tool use.
  • W (weekly) shows large remainder + many real-time hours of headroom.
  • Multiple parallel Agent (Sonnet sub-agent) launches all hit limit within minutes — burning quota seemingly faster than total work would suggest.
  • Started: 2026-04-29 evening (Europe/Kaliningrad timezone). Confirmed by independent users referencing the same date.

Ask

  1. Please confirm whether anything changed in the session-window accounting on April 29 (UTC evening).
  2. Either widen the session window proportionally to the new per-turn cost, or document the new ratio so users can plan around it.

Impact

Right now Claude Code, for which I subscribe primarily on Max tier, is significantly less usable than it was a week ago — not because of model quality (which is good), but because the cadence of forced waits has gone from "rare and predictable" to "every hour or so, no matter how lightly I work."

I do want this to keep working — that's why I'm reporting.


Mitigations I've applied so far:

  • Lowered effortLevel from high to medium in ~/.claude/settings.json (~1.5× longer windows but at quality cost).
  • Stopped launching Sonnet sub-agents in parallel (they cannibalize each other's quota).
  • Splitting big tasks into ~30-minute Sonnet chunks instead of 90.

These help, but they're workarounds, not solutions.

extent analysis

TL;DR

Adjust the session window accounting to match the increased per-turn cost introduced in the April 23, 2026 post-mortem.

Guidance

  • Investigate changes to session-window accounting on April 29, 2026 (UTC evening) to determine the cause of the disproportionate session-window depletion.
  • Consider widening the session window proportionally to the new per-turn cost to maintain usability.
  • Review the effortLevel setting in ~/.claude/settings.json to balance quality and session window duration.
  • Monitor the weekly quota and session window usage to identify patterns and optimize workflow.

Example

No code snippet is provided as the issue is related to configuration and usage patterns.

Notes

The issue seems to be related to a change in session-window accounting, which is not explicitly stated in the provided information. The user has already applied some mitigations, but a more permanent solution is needed.

Recommendation

Apply a workaround by adjusting the workflow to split tasks into smaller chunks and reducing parallel launches of Sonnet sub-agents, until the session window accounting is adjusted to match the increased per-turn cost. This will help mitigate the issue while a more permanent solution is implemented.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING