codex - 💡(How to fix) Fix Suggestion: Interactive choice prompts for user confirmation in Codex CLI/client

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

What version of Codex CLI is running?

codex-cli 0.131.0

What subscription do you have?

pro 5x

Which model were you using?

No response

What platform is your computer?

No response

What terminal emulator and version are you using (if applicable)?

No response

Codex doctor report

What issue are you seeing?

I’d like to suggest adding interactive confirmation prompts to the Codex CLI or client, similar to the experience in Claude Code.

When Codex needs to ask the user for clarification or confirmation in the middle of a task, it would be helpful if it could present several selectable options in an interactive popup or prompt, rather than only asking the user to manually type out a full response.

The key idea is to turn many clarification moments into “multiple-choice” interactions instead of purely open-ended subjective questions.

This would have several benefits:

More convenient interaction Users could quickly choose from suggested options instead of writing long manual replies. Better guidance and more possibilities By showing several possible directions, Codex can help users discover options they may not have considered themselves. Preserve full user control Users should still be able to reject all suggested options and respond with custom text when needed.

In short, I think Codex would feel more efficient and collaborative if it could surface structured, interactive choices during clarification steps, while still keeping the flexibility of free-form user input.

What steps can reproduce the bug?

Uploaded thread: 019e43ac-6bb1-7281-8669-3dcf6a8a3bc4

What is the expected behavior?

No response

Additional information

No response

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING