openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix Telegram forum-topic voice notes reach agent as raw audio while DM transcription/echo works

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…

On OpenClaw 2026.5.12, Telegram voice notes behave differently between direct chats and forum-topic group chats.

In a Telegram DM, the same gateway transcribes the voice note and sends the configured echoTranscript message.

In a Telegram forum-topic group chat, the voice note reaches the agent as a raw .ogg attachment, but the media-understanding transcript/echo path does not visibly fire. Replying to the voice note with an @mention in the topic still leaves the agent seeing raw audio rather than the transcript.

Root Cause

For Telegram forum-topic setups, voice notes are a natural input method, but Telegram does not allow clean "voice note + caption mention" usage. If OpenClaw only transcribes DMs reliably, users need to route voice capture through DMs instead of topic-based workflows.

Code Example

{
  "tools": {
    "media": {
      "audio": {
        "enabled": true,
        "echoTranscript": true,
        "echoFormat": "📝 \"{transcript}\""
      }
    }
  }
}
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Summary

On OpenClaw 2026.5.12, Telegram voice notes behave differently between direct chats and forum-topic group chats.

In a Telegram DM, the same gateway transcribes the voice note and sends the configured echoTranscript message.

In a Telegram forum-topic group chat, the voice note reaches the agent as a raw .ogg attachment, but the media-understanding transcript/echo path does not visibly fire. Replying to the voice note with an @mention in the topic still leaves the agent seeing raw audio rather than the transcript.

Environment

  • OpenClaw: 2026.5.12 (f066dd2)
  • Channel: Telegram
  • Group type: Telegram supergroup with forum topics enabled
  • Gateway mode: local / loopback
  • Audio config:
{
  "tools": {
    "media": {
      "audio": {
        "enabled": true,
        "echoTranscript": true,
        "echoFormat": "📝 \"{transcript}\""
      }
    }
  }
}

Observed behavior

Direct chat

  1. Send a Telegram voice note directly to the bot.
  2. OpenClaw posts an echo transcript, for example: 📝 "This is a task for all.".
  3. Agent receives/uses the machine transcript and responds normally.

Result: transcription and echoTranscript both work.

Forum-topic group chat

  1. Send a Telegram voice note inside a forum topic.
  2. Mention the bot in a reply to that audio message, because Telegram voice notes do not support normal captions/mentions in the same way.
  3. The agent receives a raw audio attachment, for example <media:audio> / .ogg.
  4. No visible echoTranscript message appears in the topic.
  5. The transcript is not available to the agent in the same way it is in DM.

Result: raw audio reaches the agent, but the media-understanding transcript/echo path does not fire visibly.

Expected behavior

Telegram forum-topic voice notes should go through the same media-understanding transcription path as Telegram DM voice notes, or the docs should clearly state that forum-topic voice notes require a different workflow.

If echoTranscript is enabled, the transcript echo should route to the same forum topic/thread that received the voice note.

Why this matters

For Telegram forum-topic setups, voice notes are a natural input method, but Telegram does not allow clean "voice note + caption mention" usage. If OpenClaw only transcribes DMs reliably, users need to route voice capture through DMs instead of topic-based workflows.

Related issues

This looks related but not identical to:

  • #63349
  • #53364
  • #75084
  • #62205
  • #54013

Those appear closed or report a different DM/forum direction. This report is specifically: DM works, forum-topic group path does not.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

FAQ

Expected behavior

Telegram forum-topic voice notes should go through the same media-understanding transcription path as Telegram DM voice notes, or the docs should clearly state that forum-topic voice notes require a different workflow.

If echoTranscript is enabled, the transcript echo should route to the same forum topic/thread that received the voice note.

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING