claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix ultrareview crashed before producing findings, free run consumed (consulting-os repo, 31 files / 10891 lines) [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#56259Fetched 2026-05-06 06:32:55
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
7
Reactions
0
Timeline (top)
labeled ×5commented ×1cross-referenced ×1

Error Message

Error Messages/Logs

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Preflight Checklist

  • I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet
  • This is a single bug report (please file separate reports for different bugs)
  • I am using the latest version of Claude Code

What's Wrong?

/ultrareview run crashed without producing findings on May 4, 2026 (Madrid time). Run was consumed despite zero output.

Session ID: 01QTtvNaUYCnoKrgFVmZuM9M Tracking URL: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QTtvNaUYCnoKrgFVmZuM9M Account: foundersignal

Scope: 31 files changed, 10891 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Branch comparison: main → review-base (created via git branch review-base bd6651a)
Command invoked: /ultrareview review-base

Outcome: dialog confirmed launch, "Free ultrareview 1 of 3" shown,
review went to background, returned later as crashed with no findings.
Free run was consumed.

This appears consistent with the documented infra-side failure pattern
reported in #54871, #54812, #53455, #54516, #49905.
Requesting refund of consumed free run.

What Should Happen?

.

Error Messages/Logs

Steps to Reproduce

.

Claude Model

None

Is this a regression?

Yes, this worked in a previous version

Last Working Version

No response

Claude Code Version

latest

Platform

Anthropic API

Operating System

macOS

Terminal/Shell

Terminal.app (macOS)

Additional Information

No response

extent analysis

TL;DR

The issue may be related to an infra-side failure pattern, and the user should investigate similar issues reported in #54871, #54812, #53455, #54516, #49905 for potential workarounds.

Guidance

  • Review the reported issues (#54871, #54812, #53455, #54516, #49905) to identify common patterns or solutions that may apply to this case.
  • Verify if the issue is specific to the review-base branch or if it occurs with other branches as well.
  • Check if there are any known issues with the Anthropic API or Claude Code that may be contributing to the problem.
  • Consider reaching out to the maintainers or support team for further assistance, as the issue appears to be a regression and the user is requesting a refund of the consumed free run.

Notes

The issue lacks specific error messages or logs, making it challenging to provide a more detailed analysis. The user's report of a regression and the similarity to other reported issues suggest that the problem may be related to an underlying infrastructure or API issue.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Investigate similar issues and potential solutions, as the problem appears to be related to a known infra-side failure pattern.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix ultrareview crashed before producing findings, free run consumed (consulting-os repo, 31 files / 10891 lines) [1 comments, 2 participants]