claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [v2.1.118] /usage redesign removed monthly usage visibility — this contradicts the transparency commitment [2 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#53192Fetched 2026-04-26 05:22:00
View on GitHub
Comments
2
Participants
2
Timeline
6
Reactions
1
Timeline (top)
labeled ×3commented ×2closed ×1

I am a paying Max subscriber ($200/month). I would not have renewed at this tier if I'd known monthly usage visibility was going to be silently revoked. The trust cost of this change is larger than whatever engineering simplification motivated it.

This needs to be reverted or replaced with an equivalent in-CLI view. The Console URL is not an answer.

Root Cause

I am a paying Max subscriber ($200/month). I would not have renewed at this tier if I'd known monthly usage visibility was going to be silently revoked. The trust cost of this change is larger than whatever engineering simplification motivated it.

This needs to be reverted or replaced with an equivalent in-CLI view. The Console URL is not an answer.

Fix Action

Fix / Workaround

The "workaround" — open a browser tab, log into the Console at platform.claude.com/usage — is not acceptable. The whole point of in-CLI usage tracking was that it surfaced the number where the work happens. Pushing it to a separate website, behind a separate login, is friction by design.

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

What changed

In v2.1.118 (April 23, 2026), /usage was redesigned. The previous display showed monthly usage percentage and time to quota replenish — the two numbers a paying customer actually needs to manage their relationship with this product.

Both were removed. Replaced with a 5-hour and 7-day rolling-window dashboard that does not answer the question "how much of what I'm paying for have I consumed this month."

Why this is a problem

This isn't a UI refresh. It's a deliberate transfer of visibility away from the customer and toward the vendor. Anthropic still has every byte of telemetry on my usage. I, as the paying customer, no longer have a way to see, in the tool I'm using, what I've spent.

The "workaround" — open a browser tab, log into the Console at platform.claude.com/usage — is not acceptable. The whole point of in-CLI usage tracking was that it surfaced the number where the work happens. Pushing it to a separate website, behind a separate login, is friction by design.

The mission-statement contradiction

Anthropic's public posture emphasizes transparency, honesty, and building AI that users can trust. Removing user-facing cost transparency from the tool — while the vendor retains full visibility — directly undermines that posture. You cannot claim transparency as a value while making your customers' own usage opaque to them.

What I want

  1. Restore monthly usage percentage and time-to-replenish in /usage, or expose them via:
    • a CLI flag (claude --usage --monthly)
    • a statusline variable
    • an env var that opts into the legacy display
  2. Document the change in the changelog with the actual reasoning, not just the version bump line.
  3. Acknowledge that pulling a customer-facing metric without notice or substitute was a regression, not an improvement.

Context

I am a paying Max subscriber ($200/month). I would not have renewed at this tier if I'd known monthly usage visibility was going to be silently revoked. The trust cost of this change is larger than whatever engineering simplification motivated it.

This needs to be reverted or replaced with an equivalent in-CLI view. The Console URL is not an answer.

Shame.

You charge $200 a month and you hide the meter. You write "transparency" into your mission and then quietly delete the one display that gave it to your customers. There is no reading of this that flatters you.

I trusted this company. I don't anymore.

extent analysis

TL;DR

The user wants the monthly usage percentage and time-to-replenish features restored to the /usage command or exposed through alternative means, such as a CLI flag or environment variable.

Guidance

  • Consider adding a CLI flag, such as claude --usage --monthly, to restore the removed features.
  • Expose the monthly usage percentage and time-to-replenish through a statusline variable or environment variable.
  • Document the change in the changelog with the actual reasoning behind the removal of the features.
  • Acknowledge the regression and provide a substitute or equivalent in-CLI view for the removed metrics.

Example

No code snippet is provided as it is not clearly supported by the issue.

Notes

The issue lacks technical details about the implementation, so a specific solution cannot be provided. The guidance is based on the user's requests and the context provided.

Recommendation

Apply a workaround by adding a CLI flag or exposing the metrics through alternative means, as the user is requesting restoration of the removed features or equivalent functionality. This is because the user is looking for a way to access the monthly usage percentage and time-to-replenish, which were removed without a suitable substitute.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [v2.1.118] /usage redesign removed monthly usage visibility — this contradicts the transparency commitment [2 comments, 2 participants]