codex - 💡(How to fix) Fix whats the hype????? the other company [2 comments, 1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
openai/codex#18229Fetched 2026-04-17 08:31:07
View on GitHub
Comments
2
Participants
1
Timeline
4
Reactions
0
Participants
Timeline (top)
commented ×2closed ×1labeled ×1
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

What issue are you seeing?

whats the hype????? the other company (Cloud)

the moment you use the tiny model , it spews imaginry thigns

meanwhile 5.4mini is really fast and 2 times cheaper,, compare the Sonnet or Opus model but git knowledge

srsly codex is leaps better,

What steps can reproduce the bug?

not using codex, codex is literally perject

What is the expected behavior?

No response

Additional information

No response

extent analysis

TL;DR

Consider using the Codex model as it is reported to perform better and more accurately than other models mentioned.

Guidance

  • The issue seems to be related to the performance and accuracy of different models, with Codex being the preferred choice.
  • To verify the performance difference, compare the output of the Codex model with other models like Sonnet or Opus on the same task.
  • Since the issue lacks specific technical details, it's essential to gather more information about the task, models, and environment to provide a more accurate solution.
  • The mention of "5.4mini" being "2 times cheaper" suggests that cost might be a factor in model selection, so consider evaluating models based on both performance and cost.

Notes

The issue lacks specific technical details, making it challenging to provide a definitive solution. The comparison between models seems to be based on personal experience rather than objective metrics.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Use the Codex model as it is reported to be more accurate and better performing than other models mentioned. This recommendation is based on the user's positive experience with Codex.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING