claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug] Claude Code performs unrequested file edits despite explicit "do not act" instructions [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#55683Fetched 2026-05-03 04:47:11
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
4
Reactions
0
Timeline (top)
labeled ×3commented ×1

Error Message

[{"error":"Error: Request was aborted.\n at makeRequest (B:/~BUN/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:3448)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-05-02T17:58:52.136Z"}]

Code Example

[{"error":"Error: Request was aborted.\n    at makeRequest (B:/~BUN/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:3448)\n    at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-05-02T17:58:52.136Z"}]
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Bug Description Claude code repeatedly ignores clear instructions not to act (e.g. edit files) unless explicitly instructed to do so by a phrase containing an action verb and not imply an action prompt indirectly from a statement or a user wish! This is an ongoing issue for two weeks!

Environment Info

  • Platform: win32
  • Terminal: null
  • Version: 2.1.126
  • Feedback ID: d642b3d2-006a-4daf-bbca-3bb1b853cb3a

Errors

[{"error":"Error: Request was aborted.\n    at makeRequest (B:/~BUN/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:3448)\n    at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-05-02T17:58:52.136Z"}]

extent analysis

TL;DR

The issue may be resolved by re-examining the instruction phrases to ensure they explicitly contain action verbs, as the Claude code seems to ignore implicit action prompts.

Guidance

  • Review the code's natural language processing (NLP) logic to understand how it interprets instructions and identify potential flaws in implicit action detection.
  • Verify that the instruction phrases contain explicit action verbs, such as "edit" or "modify", to ensure the code recognizes them as direct instructions.
  • Check the code's version history to see if any recent changes may have introduced this issue, considering the problem has been ongoing for two weeks.
  • Test the code with a variety of instruction phrases, both explicit and implicit, to better understand its behavior and identify potential patterns or edge cases.

Notes

The provided error message suggests a request abortion, but its connection to the instruction interpretation issue is unclear, and further investigation is needed to determine if it's related.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: rephrase instruction phrases to explicitly contain action verbs, as this is a more direct and reliable way to ensure the code recognizes and follows instructions.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING