claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug] Claude 3.5 Opus regression: Logic errors in file operations and data handlingc [1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#52039Fetched 2026-04-23 07:38:12
View on GitHub
Comments
0
Participants
1
Timeline
3
Reactions
1
Participants
Timeline (top)
labeled ×3

Error Message

[{"error":"Error: NON-FATAL: Lock acquisition failed for /Users/greg/.local/share/claude/versions/2.1.117 (expected in multi-process scenarios)\n at fn_ (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2754:2177)\n at H98 (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2754:1257)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-22T16:35:09.309Z"}]

Code Example

[{"error":"Error: NON-FATAL: Lock acquisition failed for /Users/greg/.local/share/claude/versions/2.1.117 (expected in multi-process scenarios)\n    at fn_ (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2754:2177)\n    at H98 (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2754:1257)\n    at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-22T16:35:09.309Z"}]
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Bug Description over multiple sessions today, Opus 4.7 is making dumb mistakes. Dumb mistakes I never saw with 4.6 - confusing a credit with a spend, confusing issue numbers, overwriting files that clearly shouldn't have been. I'm not one of these users that complains everytime you have a new version. This really seems like a regression.

Environment Info

  • Platform: darwin
  • Terminal: Apple_Terminal
  • Version: 2.1.117
  • Feedback ID: 83d213f3-715e-4480-9788-4a9dc32c42cf

Errors

[{"error":"Error: NON-FATAL: Lock acquisition failed for /Users/greg/.local/share/claude/versions/2.1.117 (expected in multi-process scenarios)\n    at fn_ (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2754:2177)\n    at H98 (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2754:1257)\n    at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-22T16:35:09.309Z"}]

extent analysis

TL;DR

The issue with Opus 4.7 making incorrect decisions, such as confusing credits with spends or overwriting files, may be related to a regression introduced in the new version, and checking the lock acquisition failure error could provide more insight.

Guidance

  • Investigate the "Lock acquisition failed" error for /Users/greg/.local/share/claude/versions/2.1.117 to determine if it's related to the incorrect decisions made by Opus 4.7.
  • Review the changes between Opus 4.6 and 4.7 to identify potential causes of the regression.
  • Check if the issue persists when running Opus 4.7 in a single-process scenario to isolate the problem.
  • Verify if the error occurs consistently or intermittently to help narrow down the cause.

Example

No code snippet is provided as the issue does not contain sufficient information to create a relevant example.

Notes

The provided error message suggests a potential issue with lock acquisition, which may be related to the incorrect decisions made by Opus 4.7. However, without more information about the changes between Opus 4.6 and 4.7, it's difficult to determine the root cause.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Given the potential regression in Opus 4.7, it may be necessary to revert to Opus 4.6 or apply a workaround to mitigate the issue until a fix is available.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING