claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug] /ultrareview crashes mid-stream on a normal-sized PR (no findings) [1 comments, 1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#55600Fetched 2026-05-03 04:49:14
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
1
Timeline
5
Reactions
0
Author
Participants
Timeline (top)
labeled ×4commented ×1

/ultrareview crashed twice in a row against a normal-sized PR with no findings produced either time. /review against the same PR completed cleanly, suggesting the issue is specific to the ultrareview pipeline rather than the input.

Root Cause

/ultrareview crashed twice in a row against a normal-sized PR with no findings produced either time. /review against the same PR completed cleanly, suggesting the issue is specific to the ultrareview pipeline rather than the input.

Fix Action

Workaround

/review 103 against the same PR ran cleanly. Will append /review findings as a comment for comparison.

Code Example

/ultrareview 103
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Summary

/ultrareview crashed twice in a row against a normal-sized PR with no findings produced either time. /review against the same PR completed cleanly, suggesting the issue is specific to the ultrareview pipeline rather than the input.

Environment

  • Claude Code: 2.1.126
  • Platform: Windows (git for Windows, native paths)
  • Shell: bash (via git for Windows)
  • Model: default (whatever /ultrareview picks internally)

Repro

/ultrareview 103

against this PR: https://github.com/dotcal604/worthcall/pull/103

PR shape (nothing exotic):

  • 2 commits, 17 files, 1034 additions / 180 deletions
  • ~772 of the additions are auto-generated package-lock.json (husky + lint-staged install)
  • Real code: shared/pricing.ts header rewrite, web/eslint.config.js token-enforcement rule, .husky/pre-commit (new), 7 marketing .tsx files migrated to brand tokens, 2 doc-prompt updates
  • No binaries, no submodules, no LFS, no unusual file types

(The PR is in a private repo so Anthropic eng may not have access; happy to share specifics if useful.)

Expected

/ultrareview produces a findings report.

Actual

Both runs crashed mid-stream. No findings emitted either time.

Workaround

/review 103 against the same PR ran cleanly. Will append /review findings as a comment for comparison.

Session IDs

  • First failed run: session_01MaTToiAnCNTuPvi7cR6jVr
  • Second failed run: unknown (will append in a comment if surfaced)

Notes for whoever picks this up

  • If this is reproducible against any moderately-sized PR (~1k additions, ~17 files, mix of TS/JSON/md/JS), there may be an upper-bound or timeout issue in the ultrareview pipeline.
  • /review worked on identical input — the differentiator is whatever ultrareview does extra.
  • Two crashes in a row from the same input strongly suggests it's not transient.

extent analysis

TL;DR

Investigate the ultrareview pipeline for potential upper-bound or timeout issues that may be causing it to crash on moderately-sized PRs.

Guidance

  • Verify if the issue is reproducible with other PRs of similar size (~1k additions, ~17 files, mix of TS/JSON/md/JS) to determine if it's specific to this PR or a general issue with the ultrareview pipeline.
  • Compare the differences in processing between /ultrareview and /review to identify what extra steps or checks are being performed by ultrareview that may be causing the crash.
  • Check the session logs for the failed runs (e.g., session_01MaTToiAnCNTuPvi7cR6jVr) for any error messages or clues that may indicate the cause of the crash.
  • Consider appending the /review findings as a comment to provide a baseline for comparison and to help identify what findings are missing from the ultrareview report.

Notes

The issue may be specific to the ultrareview pipeline and not a general issue with the input or the /review pipeline, given that /review worked cleanly on the same PR.

Recommendation

Apply workaround by using /review for now, as it has been shown to work cleanly on the same PR, while investigating the ultrareview pipeline for potential issues.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug] /ultrareview crashes mid-stream on a normal-sized PR (no findings) [1 comments, 1 participants]