claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [BUG] Windows 10 Pro: CoworkVMService Running but Cowork still shows Virtual Machine Platform error [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#47860Fetched 2026-04-15 06:40:16
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
4
Reactions
0
Timeline (top)
labeled ×3commented ×1

Error Message

On Windows 10 Pro, the CoworkVMService is confirmed to be running (visible in Windows Services), but Cowork (Claude Code's remote development feature) still displays a "Virtual Machine Platform" error, preventing it from functioning correctly. 4. Observe the error message about "Virtual Machine Platform" Since CoworkVMService is already running, Cowork should initialize successfully without displaying a Virtual Machine Platform error. Cowork shows a "Virtual Machine Platform" error even though CoworkVMService is active and running in Windows Services. Since CoworkVMService is already running on Windows 10 Pro, Cowork should initialize successfully and work without displaying a "Virtual Machine Platform" error. The service check should correctly detect that the required VM service is active.

Error Messages/Logs

  1. Observe that Cowork displays a "Virtual Machine Platform" error despite CoworkVMService being active
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Preflight Checklist

  • I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet
  • This is a single bug report (please file separate reports for different bugs)
  • I am using the latest version of Claude Code

What's Wrong?

Environment

  • OS: Windows 10 Pro
  • Claude Code Version: Latest
  • Platform: Windows

Bug Description

On Windows 10 Pro, the CoworkVMService is confirmed to be running (visible in Windows Services), but Cowork (Claude Code's remote development feature) still displays a "Virtual Machine Platform" error, preventing it from functioning correctly.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Install Claude Code on Windows 10 Pro
  2. Ensure CoworkVMService is running (check via services.msc)
  3. Attempt to use Cowork / remote development features in Claude Code
  4. Observe the error message about "Virtual Machine Platform"

Expected Behavior

Since CoworkVMService is already running, Cowork should initialize successfully without displaying a Virtual Machine Platform error.

Actual Behavior

Cowork shows a "Virtual Machine Platform" error even though CoworkVMService is active and running in Windows Services.

Additional Context

  • The Windows feature "Virtual Machine Platform" may or may not be explicitly enabled in Windows Features, but the service CoworkVMService is confirmed running.
  • This issue appears to be a false positive check or an incorrect dependency validation in the Cowork startup sequence on Windows 10 Pro.

What Should Happen?

Since CoworkVMService is already running on Windows 10 Pro, Cowork should initialize successfully and work without displaying a "Virtual Machine Platform" error. The service check should correctly detect that the required VM service is active.

Error Messages/Logs

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Install Claude Code on Windows 10 Pro
  2. Ensure CoworkVMService is running (verify via services.msc - service status should be "Running")
  3. Open Claude Code and attempt to use the Cowork / remote development feature
  4. Observe that Cowork displays a "Virtual Machine Platform" error despite CoworkVMService being active

Claude Model

None

Is this a regression?

Yes, this worked in a previous version

Last Working Version

No response

Claude Code Version

Latest (not specified)

Platform

Anthropic API

Operating System

macOS

Terminal/Shell

Terminal.app (macOS)

Additional Information

No response

extent analysis

TL;DR

The issue might be resolved by ensuring the "Virtual Machine Platform" Windows feature is explicitly enabled, as the error suggests a dependency validation issue despite the CoworkVMService running.

Guidance

  • Verify that the "Virtual Machine Platform" feature is enabled in Windows Features, as the service running might not be sufficient for Cowork to initialize correctly.
  • Check the startup sequence of Cowork for any incorrect dependency validations that might cause the false positive error about the Virtual Machine Platform.
  • Consider comparing the configuration and startup process of Cowork on Windows 10 Pro with a previous version where it worked to identify any changes that might have introduced this issue.
  • If the "Virtual Machine Platform" feature is already enabled, investigate further into the Cowork startup logs or error messages for more specific clues about what might be causing the service to not be recognized as running.

Example

No specific code snippet can be provided without more details on the startup sequence or dependency checks of Cowork. However, ensuring the "Virtual Machine Platform" is enabled can be done through the Windows Features dialog or via PowerShell command Enable-WindowsOptionalFeature -FeatureName VirtualMachinePlatform -Online.

Notes

The issue seems to be specific to the interaction between the CoworkVMService and the "Virtual Machine Platform" feature on Windows 10 Pro. The fact that it worked in a previous version suggests a regression, possibly due to changes in how dependencies are checked or validated.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Ensure the "Virtual Machine Platform" Windows feature is explicitly enabled, as this might resolve the dependency validation issue preventing Cowork from initializing correctly. This is recommended because the error message directly references the Virtual Machine Platform, suggesting its status is critical to resolving the issue.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING