claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix Claude Code ignores its own safety hooks — violation #120 [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#54077Fetched 2026-04-28 06:39:50
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
5
Reactions
0
Author
Timeline (top)
labeled ×3commented ×1cross-referenced ×1
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Automated Violation Report

Claude Code edited danger zone file types.ts despite receiving:

  • DANGER ZONE warnings (15+ prior failed approaches)
  • MANDATORY search requirements
  • Harmonic Code Council (HCC) review warnings
  • Approach tracking warnings

Violation count this project: 120

Project: songwish-platform (Creative Life game) User complaint: Claude generates before searching, declares victory before testing, ignores its own hook warnings. Full details: https://github.com/SongWish/songwish-platform/blob/main/docs/framework/anthropic_feedback.md

What the user built to compensate:

  • 5 PreToolUse hooks (search, track, danger zone, HCC, playtest)
  • 2 PostToolUse hooks (verify removal, violation logger)
  • 4 parallel AI specialist Harmonic Code Council / HCC (Haiku API calls)
  • Automated Playwright walkthrough bot

What still fails: Claude reads warnings in system-reminder tags and proceeds without addressing them. The model treats hook output as skippable context, not mandatory gates.

Structural fix needed: PreToolUse hook warnings should require explicit acknowledgment before the edit proceeds, not just be injected as additional context.

extent analysis

TL;DR

Modify the PreToolUse hook warnings to require explicit acknowledgment before proceeding with the edit.

Guidance

  • Review the implementation of PreToolUse hooks to ensure they are properly integrated and not just injecting warnings as context.
  • Investigate how Claude is processing hook output and modify it to treat warnings as mandatory gates rather than skippable context.
  • Consider adding a mechanism for explicit acknowledgment of warnings, such as a confirmation prompt or a required response.
  • Examine the Harmonic Code Council (HCC) review warnings and Approach tracking warnings to ensure they are properly integrated with the PreToolUse hooks.

Example

// Pseudocode example of requiring explicit acknowledgment
if (hookWarning) {
  const acknowledgment = await getExplicitAcknowledgment();
  if (acknowledgment) {
    // Proceed with edit
  } else {
    // Abort edit and display warning
  }
}

Notes

The provided information suggests that the issue is with how Claude is processing hook output and warnings. However, without more details on the implementation, it's difficult to provide a complete solution.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Modify the PreToolUse hook warnings to require explicit acknowledgment before proceeding with the edit, as this directly addresses the identified issue and provides a clear path forward.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING