claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix Claude Code ignores its own safety hooks — violation #55 [2 comments, 3 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#53763Fetched 2026-04-28 06:47:53
View on GitHub
Comments
2
Participants
3
Timeline
5
Reactions
0
Author
Timeline (top)
labeled ×3commented ×2
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Automated Violation Report

Claude Code edited danger zone file grammar.ts despite receiving:

  • DANGER ZONE warnings (15+ prior failed approaches)
  • MANDATORY search requirements
  • Harmonic Code Council (HCC) review warnings
  • Approach tracking warnings

Violation count this project: 55

Project: songwish-platform (Creative Life game) User complaint: Claude generates before searching, declares victory before testing, ignores its own hook warnings. Full details: https://github.com/SongWish/songwish-platform/blob/main/docs/framework/anthropic_feedback.md

What the user built to compensate:

  • 5 PreToolUse hooks (search, track, danger zone, HCC, playtest)
  • 2 PostToolUse hooks (verify removal, violation logger)
  • 4 parallel AI specialist Harmonic Code Council / HCC (Haiku API calls)
  • Automated Playwright walkthrough bot

What still fails: Claude reads warnings in system-reminder tags and proceeds without addressing them. The model treats hook output as skippable context, not mandatory gates.

Structural fix needed: PreToolUse hook warnings should require explicit acknowledgment before the edit proceeds, not just be injected as additional context.

extent analysis

TL;DR

Modify the PreToolUse hooks to require explicit acknowledgment of warnings before proceeding with the edit.

Guidance

  • Review the implementation of PreToolUse hooks to ensure they are properly integrated with the editing process and cannot be skipped.
  • Update the hook warnings to be treated as mandatory gates rather than skippable context, requiring explicit acknowledgment before proceeding.
  • Consider adding a mechanism to pause or cancel the editing process if warnings are not acknowledged, to prevent unintended changes.
  • Investigate the Harmonic Code Council (HCC) review warnings and Approach tracking warnings to ensure they are properly configured and integrated with the PreToolUse hooks.

Example

No code snippet is provided as the issue does not contain specific code details.

Notes

The provided information suggests that the issue is related to the integration of PreToolUse hooks and the treatment of warnings as skippable context. However, without more detailed information about the implementation, it is difficult to provide a more specific solution.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Modify the PreToolUse hooks to require explicit acknowledgment of warnings before proceeding with the edit, as this is the most direct approach to addressing the issue.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING