codex - 💡(How to fix) Fix Codex Desktop: show archived chats in the normal chat list as greyed-out rows [1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
openai/codex#20732Fetched 2026-05-03 04:46:34
View on GitHub
Comments
0
Participants
1
Timeline
3
Reactions
0
Author
Participants
Timeline (top)
labeled ×3
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

What feature would you like to see?

In Codex Desktop, please add an option to show archived chats in the regular project/sidebar chat list, rendered as muted/greyed-out rows instead of hiding them only under Settings → Archived Threads.

Problem

For users with many Codex conversations per project, archiving is not the same as deleting. Archived chats are often completed work or old context that should stay discoverable in the project history, but they should not visually compete with active chats.

Right now, once a chat is archived it effectively disappears from the normal project/chat list. To find it again, the user has to go to Settings → Archived Threads or rely on search. This makes archive feel like a separate storage area rather than a natural part of the project timeline.

Proposed UX

  • Add a setting/filter such as Show archived chats in all chats or a view toggle like Active / Archived / All.
  • When archived chats are visible in the normal sidebar list, render them as muted grey rows, ideally with a small archive icon.
  • Keep active chats visually primary; archived chats should be clearly secondary.
  • The row context menu should still allow Unarchive.
  • Search results should include archived chats and mark them as archived.
  • Project/grouped views should show archived chats under their original project when the user chooses the All view.

Why this helps

This would let users scan project history without manually unarchiving old chats, while still keeping the active working set clean. It also makes archive a safer and more useful workflow tool: “done but preserved” instead of “hidden away.”

Related but different from

There are existing issues around archived or local sessions being hidden, lost, or failing to resume. This request is not about data loss; it is a UX request for a unified list view where archived chats remain visible but visually de-emphasized.

extent analysis

TL;DR

Add a setting to show archived chats in the regular project/sidebar chat list, rendering them as muted/greyed-out rows.

Guidance

  • Consider adding a toggle or filter, such as Show archived chats in all chats or Active / Archived / All, to control the visibility of archived chats.
  • When displaying archived chats, use a muted grey color and a small archive icon to visually distinguish them from active chats.
  • Ensure that the row context menu still allows Unarchive for archived chats, and that search results include archived chats with an "archived" marker.
  • Test the proposed UX changes to verify that they meet the user's requirements and do not introduce any usability issues.

Example

No code snippet is provided as the issue is focused on UX design and does not include any specific code references.

Notes

The proposed solution assumes that the existing architecture and technical infrastructure can support the addition of a new setting and the rendering of archived chats in the regular chat list. Further technical analysis may be required to confirm feasibility.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Add a setting to show archived chats in the regular project/sidebar chat list, as this addresses the user's request for a unified list view and provides a clear visual distinction between active and archived chats.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING