Issue Station
Sign In
Tools hereToolbox

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Feature Request] Improve model reasoning consistency and memory adherence in Claude Code [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#52041•Fetched 2026-04-23 07:38:08
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
3
Reactions
0
Author
digitaljcdigitaljc
Participants
digitaljcdigitaljcgenchatsgenchats
Timeline (top)
labeled ×2commented ×1
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Bug Description Claude 4.7 is not usable for paid work in its current state. 17+ rounds of bot reviews on a single PR, constantly deviates from memory.md, no longer anticipates the obvious. In general, compared to 4.6, reasoning of your current model did not graduate. It's bad enough that I'm actually considering a fresh review of your competitors' capabilities to determine if better fit. While I understand that you need to manage capacity, this result is absolutely a regression/not satisfactory. Also, respectfully requesting consideration for credit of tokens that have been unnecessarily utilized by the new model.

extent analysis

TL;DR

The current version of Claude 4.7 may need to be reverted or a workaround applied to restore its previous functionality and usability for paid work.

Guidance

  • Review the differences in behavior between Claude 4.6 and 4.7 to identify specific areas of regression.
  • Consider reaching out to the development team for guidance on potential workarounds or fixes for the issues encountered.
  • Evaluate the feasibility of reverting to Claude 4.6 until the issues with 4.7 are resolved.
  • Document the unnecessary token utilization for potential credit reimbursement.

Notes

The issue lacks technical details, making it challenging to provide a precise solution. The guidance provided is based on the information given, focusing on identifying the regression and seeking support.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Given the significant regression in functionality, applying a workaround, such as reverting to a previous version or adjusting usage patterns, seems necessary until a fix is available.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…
#api#ssr#mixed precision#training loop#device allocation

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Feature Request] Improve model reasoning consistency and memory adherence in Claude Code [1 comments, 2 participants]