claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [FEATURE] why can't i able to see the difference in eidtor what edited that should be shown, without that how can we see the standards [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#51906Fetched 2026-04-23 07:41:44
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
3
Reactions
0
Timeline (top)
labeled ×2commented ×1
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Preflight Checklist

  • I have searched existing requests and this feature hasn't been requested yet
  • This is a single feature request (not multiple features)

Problem Statement

we need code review option like cursor or claude, where we can see all codes accept or reject it

Proposed Solution

we need code review option like cursor or claude, where we can see all codes accept or reject it

Alternative Solutions

we need code review option like cursor or claude, where we can see all codes accept or reject it

Priority

Critical - Blocking my work

Feature Category

CLI commands and flags

Use Case Example

No response

Additional Context

No response

extent analysis

TL;DR

Implement a code review feature with accept and reject options for CLI commands and flags.

Guidance

  • Identify the required functionality for the code review feature, including the ability to view all codes and accept or reject them.
  • Determine the technical requirements for integrating this feature into the existing CLI commands and flags.
  • Research existing code review tools like Cursor or Claude to understand their implementation and potential inspiration for the feature.
  • Consider the priority and potential impact of this feature on the overall workflow, given its critical and blocking nature.

Notes

The provided information lacks specific technical details, making it challenging to offer a precise solution. Further discussion on the implementation details and requirements of the code review feature is necessary.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Implement a basic code review feature with accept and reject options as a temporary solution until a more comprehensive feature can be developed, given the critical priority of this request.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING