codex - 💡(How to fix) Fix Significant increase in quota consumption after upgrading to v0.130.0 [1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
openai/codex#22459Fetched 2026-05-14 03:35:42
View on GitHub
Comments
0
Participants
1
Timeline
2
Reactions
2
Author
Participants
Timeline (top)
labeled ×2
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

What version of Codex CLI is running?

codex-cli 0.130.0

What subscription do you have?

Pro $200

Which model were you using?

gpt-5.5

What platform is your computer?

Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.26200.0 x64

What terminal emulator and version are you using (if applicable)?

Windows Terminal (WSL / PowerShell)

What issue are you seeing?

Since upgrading to Codex v0.130.0, we have observed a significant increase in quota/usage consumption compared to previous versions under nearly identical workflows.

Issue

Before upgrading, our normal usage pattern (same working hours, similar prompt sizes, similar review/refactor workloads) resulted in approximately 50% of our weekly quota remaining after a full week of usage.

After upgrading to v0.130.0, we now hit:

the 5-hour limit substantially faster and the weekly limit within approximately 2–3 days

This behavior started immediately after the upgrade and appears reproducible across multiple sessions.

Expected Behavior

Usage/quota consumption should remain relatively consistent between versions when workload characteristics remain similar.

Actual Behavior

Quota usage appears to have increased drastically in v0.130.0 despite:

similar prompt complexity similar repository sizes similar coding/review workflows similar daily active usage time Additional Context

Environment/workflow:

Heavy repository review usage Large PHP/Laravel + FiveM related codebases Frequent /review and refactor style prompts Same operational pattern as before the upgrade

Observed impact:

Previously: ~50% quota remaining after 1 week Now: limits exhausted within 2–3 days

What steps can reproduce the bug?

  1. Upgrade Codex CLI/client from a pre-v0.130.0 version to v0.130.0.
  2. Use the same repositories and workflows as before the upgrade:
  • Similar prompt sizes
  • Similar /review requests
  • Similar refactor/debug sessions
  • Similar daily usage duration
  1. Continue normal usage for several days.
  2. Compare quota consumption between versions.

Result With v0.130.0, the 5-hour and weekly limits are reached significantly faster (weekly limit reached in ~2–3 days instead of ~1 week with ~50% remaining).

Expected Result Quota usage should remain approximately consistent when workload and usage patterns are unchanged between versions.

What is the expected behavior?

Expected behavior is that quota/token consumption remains relatively consistent between Codex versions when usage patterns, repositories, prompt sizes, and workflows remain the same.

Under the same workload, we would expect:

Similar 5-hour quota consumption as previous versions Weekly limits to last approximately the same duration as before the upgrade No major increase in token/context usage without a corresponding increase in workload

Upgrading to v0.130.0 should not drastically reduce available usage capacity for identical day-to-day operations.

Additional information

No response

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING