claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix You've hit your limit · resets 9pm (Europe/London) [1 comments, 2 participants]

[{"error":"Error: NON-FATAL: Lock acquisition failed for /home/yucelz/.local/share/claude/versions/2.1.107 (expected in multi-process scenarios)\n at Id$ (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2336:2153)\n at ct8 (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2336:1233)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-14T15:25:23.084Z"},{"error":"Error: 429 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"rate_limit_error","message":"This request would exceed your account's rate limit. Please try again later."},"request_id":"req_011Ca3uP4V3U9Yvc66YTkfCA"}\n at generate (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:52441)\n at makeRequest (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:4943)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-14T15:31:12.718Z"}]

TL;DR

The issue can be mitigated by waiting for a longer period before resuming the session to avoid exceeding the rate limit.

Guidance

• The error messages indicate a rate limit error, suggesting that the session is using up the session token too quickly.
• The "wait and continue later" option may not be sufficient to avoid hitting the rate limit again, so a longer wait time may be necessary.
• Review the session usage patterns to identify opportunities to reduce the number of requests made within a short time frame.
• Consider implementing a retry mechanism with exponential backoff to handle rate limit errors more robustly.

Example

No code example is provided as the issue does not contain sufficient information about the codebase.

Notes

The provided error messages and environment information do not give clear insight into the root cause of the issue, but they do suggest a rate limiting problem. The guidance provided is based on the assumption that the rate limit is being exceeded due to excessive session usage.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Implement a longer wait time before resuming the session and consider implementing a retry mechanism with exponential backoff to handle rate limit errors more robustly. This is recommended because the issue seems to be related to rate limiting, and these workarounds can help mitigate the problem.