codex - 💡(How to fix) Fix Add a web-based Codex plugin marketplace and let Codex submit feedback with user approval

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…

Root Cause

Feedback
I have two related requests:

  1. Provide an official web-based entry point for the Codex plugin marketplace
Today, plugins are mainly browsed inside the Codex app. However, the desktop app is not convenient to zoom or browse on a large screen, which makes it harder to review plugin lists, compare capabilities, read installation instructions, understand permissions, and share plugin links.
The plugin ecosystem needs a better public discovery surface, similar to the App Store or Chrome Web Store. A web-based plugin directory could support search, filtering, categories, plugin detail pages, example prompts, permission details, screenshots, changelogs, official vs. third-party labels, installation instructions, and shareable links.
  2. Allow Codex to submit product feedback or issue reports directly, with explicit user approval
Users often describe product feedback clearly inside a Codex conversation, but then still need to find the feedback entry point, copy the text, paste it somewhere else, and submit it manually. That extra step means a lot of valuable feedback dies at the last inch.
It would be helpful if Codex could, after explicit user confirmation, submit the current product suggestion, bug report, or UX issue directly to OpenAI’s feedback system. Ideally, Codex would return a feedback ID or submission status after submitting. Why this matters
For the plugin ecosystem to grow, users need an easier way to discover, compare, and share plugins. For the product to improve quickly, OpenAI needs a lower-friction path for users to submit real feedback. When plugin discovery and feedback submission both require extra in-app steps, many users will simply give up. This is especially true because people often assume “someone else must have already reported this,” which can cause obvious issues to receive weaker feedback signals than they deserve. One-sentence summary
Please add an official web-based Codex plugin marketplace, and allow Codex to submit feedback directly after explicit user approval, so plugin discovery and feedback reporting both become much lower-friction.
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

What variant of Codex are you using?

mac IDE

What feature would you like to see?

no-active-thread-019e9628-47dd-7210-92d8-839be056cc1f

Feedback
I have two related requests:

  1. Provide an official web-based entry point for the Codex plugin marketplace
Today, plugins are mainly browsed inside the Codex app. However, the desktop app is not convenient to zoom or browse on a large screen, which makes it harder to review plugin lists, compare capabilities, read installation instructions, understand permissions, and share plugin links.
The plugin ecosystem needs a better public discovery surface, similar to the App Store or Chrome Web Store. A web-based plugin directory could support search, filtering, categories, plugin detail pages, example prompts, permission details, screenshots, changelogs, official vs. third-party labels, installation instructions, and shareable links.
  2. Allow Codex to submit product feedback or issue reports directly, with explicit user approval
Users often describe product feedback clearly inside a Codex conversation, but then still need to find the feedback entry point, copy the text, paste it somewhere else, and submit it manually. That extra step means a lot of valuable feedback dies at the last inch.
It would be helpful if Codex could, after explicit user confirmation, submit the current product suggestion, bug report, or UX issue directly to OpenAI’s feedback system. Ideally, Codex would return a feedback ID or submission status after submitting. Why this matters
For the plugin ecosystem to grow, users need an easier way to discover, compare, and share plugins. For the product to improve quickly, OpenAI needs a lower-friction path for users to submit real feedback. When plugin discovery and feedback submission both require extra in-app steps, many users will simply give up. This is especially true because people often assume “someone else must have already reported this,” which can cause obvious issues to receive weaker feedback signals than they deserve. One-sentence summary
Please add an official web-based Codex plugin marketplace, and allow Codex to submit feedback directly after explicit user approval, so plugin discovery and feedback reporting both become much lower-friction.

Additional information

No response

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING