claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug] False positive cyber safeguard blocks agentic workflow, causing token loss without recovery path

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…

Error Message

[{"error":"Error: 400 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"invalid_request_error","message":"The following domains are not accessible to our user agent: ['reddit.com']. Read more: https://support.anthropic.com/en/articles/8896518-does-anthropic-crawl-data-from-the-web-and-how-can-site-owners-block-the-crawler"},"request_id":"req_011CbitUE6dZHFraD2X67wij"}\n at generate (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:65489)\n at makeRequest (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:51:7694)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-06-04T20:56:53.963Z"}]

Code Example

[{"error":"Error: 400 {\"type\":\"error\",\"error\":{\"type\":\"invalid_request_error\",\"message\":\"The following domains are not accessible to our user agent: ['reddit.com']. Read more: https://support.anthropic.com/en/articles/8896518-does-anthropic-crawl-data-from-the-web-and-how-can-site-owners-block-the-crawler\"},\"request_id\":\"req_011CbitUE6dZHFraD2X67wij\"}\n    at generate (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:65489)\n    at makeRequest (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:51:7694)\n    at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-06-04T20:56:53.963Z"}]
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Bug Description Subject: False positive on cyber safeguard — token loss during agentic workflow

Request ID: req_011CbjamdwURFvMLxhwasjsT

While running an autonomous (agentic) workflow in Claude Code, one request was blocked with the message that it "appears to violate the Usage Policy" and "triggered cyber-related safeguards." My task was legitimate and contained nothing harmful or cyber-offensive.

The core problems I'm reporting:

  1. False positive: The blocked request was part of normal development work and did not involve creating malware, exploits, or any malicious activity. The cyber safeguard appears to have misclassified it.

  2. Token loss: Before the final request was blocked, the agent had already consumed roughly 1,000,000 tokens across sub-tasks. Those tokens were billed to me even though the workflow was halted and could not be completed.

  3. No recovery path: Once the request was blocked, the main thread could not continue. There was no way to resume the workflow, so all the work and tokens up to that point were lost.

What I'm requesting:

  • A review of the block on Request ID req_011CbjamdwURFvMLxhwasjsT to confirm whether it was a false positive.
  • Consideration of a token refund/credit for the ~1M tokens consumed by the interrupted workflow.
  • Guidance on how to avoid this happening again, and whether the Cyber Verification Program applies to my use case.

Please let me know what additional details you need. Thank you.

Environment Info

  • Platform: darwin
  • Terminal: ghostty
  • Version: 2.1.162
  • Feedback ID: b7b223ab-417f-481b-801c-269a387c936a

Errors

[{"error":"Error: 400 {\"type\":\"error\",\"error\":{\"type\":\"invalid_request_error\",\"message\":\"The following domains are not accessible to our user agent: ['reddit.com']. Read more: https://support.anthropic.com/en/articles/8896518-does-anthropic-crawl-data-from-the-web-and-how-can-site-owners-block-the-crawler\"},\"request_id\":\"req_011CbitUE6dZHFraD2X67wij\"}\n    at generate (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:65489)\n    at makeRequest (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:51:7694)\n    at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-06-04T20:56:53.963Z"}]

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING